Thesis review

    Does the latest filing still support the original thesis?

    One company's prior 10-K thesis inputs compared with its latest 10-K: growth, margin and share count, and which assumptions the new evidence puts under strain.

    Example as of 2026-10-07 (closing prices) · version 1 · eight real companies, illustrative share counts.

    NVIDIA CORP: original inputs vs latest filing

    Thesis inputFY ending 2025-01-26FY ending 2026-01-25Change
    Revenue$130.50B$215.94B65.5%
    Operating margin62.4%60.4%-2.0 pp
    Diluted shares24804M24514M-1.2%

    Assumptions under strain

    • Revenue grew 65.5% year over year; a model carrying a steady single-digit growth rate needs a new base.
    • Operating margin moved −2.0 pp (62.4% → 60.4%); the terminal margin assumption should be re-examined.
    • Diluted shares fell 1.2%; per-share value changes even if enterprise value does not.

    Source: NVDA 10-K 0001045810-26-000021. The prior year is the comparative reported in the same series.

    Assumptions

    • Share counts are illustrative; prices are the 2026-10-07 close; weights use market value.
    • Company figures are the latest annual 10-K values in SEC XBRL; "Not reported" means the company does not tag that figure.
    • Scenario returns and oil channel classifications are stated assumptions, not estimates.

    Sources

    Apply this to your holdings

    One holding per line as ticker, shares, price (for example AAPL,25,336.67). Your holdings stay in this browser, carry through checkout and reopen in Capital Command. Market Ontology Desk.