Portfolio review

    What in this portfolio could change the next decision?

    A dated review of an eight-stock example book: weights, concentration, upcoming reports, rate and oil exposure, and what would change the next decision. Sourced from SEC filings and FRED.

    Example as of 2026-10-07 (closing prices) · version 1 · eight real companies, illustrative share counts.

    What would change the next decision

    • AAPL, NVDA, MSFT, JPM, DAL, XOM exceed a 10% cap; effective holdings are 7.1 of 8. Concentration
    • AAPL, MSFT, JPM, XOM, PG, DAL are estimated to report within 45 days. Earnings checklist
    • NVDA: Revenue grew 65.5% year over year; a model carrying a steady single-digit growth rate needs a new base. Revisit
    • MSFT: Revenue grew 17.8% year over year; a model carrying a steady single-digit growth rate needs a new base. Revisit
    • JPM: Diluted shares fell 3.4%; per-share value changes even if enterprise value does not. Revisit
    • AAPL: Diluted shares fell 2.6%; per-share value changes even if enterprise value does not. Revisit
    • Worst stated scenario: Broad equity drawdown (index −20%), -23.6%. Stress test
    • 10-year yield 5.28%, WTI $96.24. Rates · Oil

    Position weights

    HoldingSectorSharesCloseValueWeight
    AAPL Apple Inc.Information technology60$336.67$20,20019.2%
    NVDA NVIDIA CORPInformation technology80$237.47$18,99818.0%
    MSFT MICROSOFT CORPInformation technology30$529.76$15,89315.1%
    JPM JPMORGAN CHASE & COFinancials40$329.58$13,18312.5%
    DAL DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Industrials (airline)150$82.97$12,44611.8%
    XOM Exxon Mobil CorpEnergy70$164.05$11,48410.9%
    PG PROCTER & GAMBLE CoConsumer staples50$147.82$7,3917.0%
    HD HOME DEPOT, INC.Consumer discretionary20$285.77$5,7155.4%

    Concentration measures

    MeasureValueWhat it means
    Largest position19.2%AAPL alone moves the book 1.92% for every 10% it moves.
    Top three52.3%AAPL, NVDA, MSFT drive most of the outcome.
    Herfindahl index0.142Sum of squared weights; 0.125 would be eight equal positions.
    Effective holdings7.1The book behaves like 7.1 equal-weight positions, not 8.
    Largest sector52.3%Information technology.

    Against a 10% position cap, AAPL (19.2%, 9.2 pp over), NVDA (18.0%, 8.0 pp over), MSFT (15.1%, 5.1 pp over), JPM (12.5%, 2.5 pp over), DAL (11.8%, 1.8 pp over), XOM (10.9%, 0.9 pp over) breach the limit. Trimming is one response; the decision depends on whether the evidence for each position still holds.

    Assumptions

    • Share counts are illustrative; prices are the 2026-10-07 close; weights use market value.
    • Company figures are the latest annual 10-K values in SEC XBRL; "Not reported" means the company does not tag that figure.
    • Scenario returns and oil channel classifications are stated assumptions, not estimates.

    Sources

    Apply this to your holdings

    One holding per line as ticker, shares, price (for example AAPL,25,336.67). Your holdings stay in this browser, carry through checkout and reopen in Capital Command. Market Ontology Desk.